Archive for the ‘Judgments’ Category

Debtor collectors have now turned to social media outlets such as Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, Friendster, LinkedIn, and other various social media web-sites to collect information on debtors.  There have also been reports in the media of debt collectors sending messages to Debtors, as well as their friends, family, and colleagues, through these social media sites.

These debt collectors are searching these social media sites for information on debtors, such as employment information, current residence, friends and family information, aliases, and nicknames.  This information can be used to help track down Debtors for collection purposes. They are also attempting to relay messages to Debtors through friends, family, and colleagues asking the Debtors to contact to collector at a specified phone number.

One way to avoid the use of social media against you is to closely monitor and manage your privacy settings.  Make sure that the details of your profile are not viewable by search engine or on the social media site itself. Also, closely monitor and screen who is attempting to connect to your social network.  Finally, reconsider the information that your publishing on the Internet.  It is nearly impossible to control that information once you send it into the Web.

If you have been served by a deputy sheriff or constable, or by first class mail, a document entitled “Application for Supplementary Process,” your problems with debt have become very serious.  Your Creditor(s) have already obtained a judgment for money against you in a separate legal proceeding. In all likelihood, you have received a copy of the complaint, relevant motions, and judgment associated with that proceeding. Supplementary process is the next step that enables creditors to collect monies owed to them.  Supplementary Process is used to compel a Debtor to pay the amounts due on the money judgment. This is a process that is permitted under the laws of the Commonwealth, specifically Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 224 s. 14.

After an  Application by a Judgment Creditor has been made to a District Court, you will be issued a summons by the Court, which commands your attendance a  hearing on a specific date and time.  The goal of the application and summons is to compel you to be physically present at a courthouse. This will allow the attorney for the Judgment Creditor to investigate your financial affairs and examine your ability to pay the outstanding judgment. Many collection attorneys send a financial worksheet to Judgment Debtors to fill out prior to the hearing date.  Otherwise, you will likely be handed this worksheet by the collection attorney on the day of supplementary process hearing.  In most cases, the Creditor’s attorney will insist that you enter into a monthly payment plan, or make a lump sum payment, if there are assets available to satisfy the judgment. In other words, your Creditors are placing you on a court supervised payment plan and schedule, and can use the District Court as an enforcement mechanism.

If you fail to appear at the scheduled Supplementary Process hearing, you will be defaulted by the Clerk, and a Capias will issue against you.  The court will also continue (reschedule) the hearing for a later date.  A Capias is a civil warrant, also called a “bench warrant,” for your arrest.  This warrant was issued because you have failed to obey the summons issued to you, and failed to be physically present at the Supplementary Process hearing.  Once the Capias is issued to the Creditor’s attorney, you will likely be contacted by a Deputy Sheriff from the Sheriff’s Department, who will provide you with instructions on where you must meet him/her prior to the continued hearing date. If you fail to cooperate with the Deputy Sheriff, you can be placed in custody by the Sheriff’s Department, and will be physically transported to the courthouse for examination, and will be required to explain to the Court your reasons for non-compliance with the summons.  In other words, there are great risks associated with being uncooperative during a Supplementary Process proceeding, and you should make every effort to comply with a Court issued summons or the Deputy Sheriff, until you decide to file for bankruptcy.

How can one avoid Supplementary Process and its perils?

The most certain method of stopping a supplementary process proceeding; collection attorney investigation of your financial affairs; court ordered payment plans; court summonses; oversight by the Sheriff’s Department; and arrest, is to file a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition. The automatic stay, 11 U.S.C. s. 362, prohibits your creditors from engaging in collection activity against you after you have file a petition for relief under the bankruptcy code.  If you are subject to a supplementary process proceeding, a copy of your Notice of Bankruptcy Case filing can be provided to the Deputy Sheriff and/or the District Court, which will suspend that proceeding until you receive your bankruptcy discharge.  A bankruptcy petition has many benefits, and it is extremely effective in terminating the pains and perils associated with supplementary process.  Even if you have an inability to pay the judgment on the first hearing date, the Supplementary process action will remain ongoing and you may be required to go to the courthouse every 3-6 months, depending on the court’s schedule.  If you are currently subject to this proceeding, please contact one of our bankruptcy attorneys for more information on how to obtain a fresh start and stop collection activity against you.

Your lenders will generally “write off” a delinquent account as a bad debt after 180 days, or six months. Most lenders attempt to collect their debts for a period of 180 days, and then, after that period,  issue a “charge off.”  This action is reported to the consumer reporting agencies (such as Experian) and will appear as a “charge off” or as “collection” on your credit report.

A “charge off” means that your delinquent debt was sold and/or transferred for collection purposes to a third party.   In all likelihood, after your debts are charged off, you will remain legally responsible for repaying the debt.  In other words, your debt is a contract to repay money, and those rights may be sold, assigned, and transferred to a third party. Some of the large credit card companies use collection agencies to collect their debts.  Here, credit issuers prefer to outsource their collections to aggressive third party agencies who take the risk and rewards in collecting delinquent debts.  In the alternative, many companies and debt collectors are active in the delinquent consumer debt market, and purchase delinquent debt from credit card companies. In these cases, your debt is sold to these companies for a fraction of its full value.

In either instance you have a right to request that the original creditor or new account owner provide documentation that verifies the debt.  You have a right to request a record of assignment and transfer if your debt was sold to a third party.  You also have the right to request an account statement that provides a breakdown of the principal and interest owed, as well as a statement of all credits made to your account. For more information, see the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 USC s. 1692(g) for the Federal statutes concerning the validation of debts.

If you are considering paying debts that are now owned by a third party, keep in mind that paying off those debts may not improve your FICO credit score. The most important factor that weighs upon your credit score is what the original creditor reports to the consumer reporting agency. This report is weighed upon much more heavily than what is reported by a debt collector or third party assignee of a debt.  In other words, paying off collections accounts does not improve your FICO credit score.

Judge William C. Hillman, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the District of Massachusetts, recently issued a ruling that a Debtor’s Chapter 13 plan cannot be confirmed if a portion of the Debtor’s income is used to pay monthly expenses associated with a vacation property or second home. This opinion does not apply to investment properties, such as rental properties.

Judge Hillman ruled that a Debtor’s income that was dedicated to paying expenses for a vacation property (such as a mortgage) are not permitted and should be used to pay unsecured creditors; thus allowing the Chapter 13 trustee’s objection to a Debtor’s Chapter 13 plan.

In a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, a Debtor is permitted to deduct certain expenses from his income (such as food, clothing, utilities, etc.). The amount of money left over after all allowed expenses are paid is known as disposable monthly income. The disposable monthly income is paid to the Chapter 13 trustee who pays the money to the Debtor’s unsecured creditors. (for a more detailed explanation, visit our chapter 13 information page).

This ruling means that if a Chapter 13 debtor owns a vacation home; he/she is not permitted to include any of the expenses associated with associated with that property (such as utilities, taxes and mortgage) because the expenses are not reasonable and necessary. This ruling likely will apply to all types of vacation property, including time shares.

A vacation property is viewed as a luxury, and cannot be retained by a debtor in a Chapter 13 proceeding. The property must be liquidated and proceeds must be turned over to creditors, or surrendered in the bankruptcy proceeding. In other words, Chapter 13 debtors in Massachusetts will not be able to keep their vacation homes unless their creditors receive a 100% dividend/payout.